There was a previous universe that existed prior to our own, and signs of its existence can be detected within black holes.

A Nobel Prize-winning physicist has suggested that there was a universe before the Big Bang, and that today’s black holes may contain proof of its existence. Sir Roger Penrose said this after being given an award for his work on Einstein’s general theory of relativity and for black hole existence. Sir Roger explains that areas of electromagnetic radiation that have unexplained shapes in the sky – ‘Hawking Points’ are part of the previous universe. This is part of the conformal cyclic cosmology of the universe and is proposing that these points are the final emission of energy known as the Hawking radiation that black holes let out from the earlier universe.

Black holes are areas where matter has been compressed due to gravity and the pull is so intense that it traps light. It may occur at the heart of the galaxy; Reinhard Genzel and Andrea Ghez, who jointly received the Nobel Prize with Sir Roger, provided the strongest evidence of a supermassive black hole in the Milky Way. Since the process of evaporation may take much longer than the age of the current universe it may not even be possible to detect.

“I assert that there is observation of Hawking radiation,” the revelation made by Sir Roger which was cited in The Telegraph has it, “The Big Bang was not the beginning, there was something before the Big Bang, and that something is what we will have in the future. ”We have a universe that expands, and everything turns into a decay, and in this hysterical conjecture of mine, that distant future appears to be the Big Bang of another age.

‘So our Big Bang began in the distant future of a previous aeon, and there would be similar black holes ejecting particles through Hawking evaporation and turning into these points on the sky that I named Hawking Points.

“We’re seeing them. These locations are approximately eight times the diameter of the Moon and are somewhat warmed up areas. At least six of these points are supported by reasonable evidence.

However, many people have criticized the theory, and the reality of this form of radiation from black holes has yet to be proved.

Furthermore, if an infinitely vast universe in one existence must become an endlessly tiny universe in the next, it would be necessary for all particles to lose mass as the cosmos matures, an idea that has also been challenged.

According to conventional cosmology, the universe experienced a short expansion or ‘inflation’ following the Big Bang, which erased abnormalities in its structure.

Sir Roger responded by stating that black holes were likewise disregarded as simply being in mathematics until their actuality was proven.