Going Faster Than The Speed Of Light Would Change How We See The Universe
The three dimensions of space and one of time of our continuum are flipped on their heads.
Nothing can move faster than the speed of light, according to special relativity. A mass-containing object would need more and more energy to accelerate toward the speed of light without really achieving it. Theoretical methods can, however, expand the scope of relativity to encompass objects and observers travelling faster than the speed of light. It is not only feasible to accomplish that without creating paradoxes, but there are also some fascinating implications for physics that involves both slower and faster than light motion.
In the case of our universe, which is a 3+1 space-time continuum with three space dimensions and one time dimension, relativity explains the world with something called a metric. Physicists can experiment with several different metrics that are available. The sole distinction between space and time in the conventional one is a negative sign in some of the equations. There are further crucial prerequisites as well: The fact that all inertial observers share the identical rules of physics and that the speed of light in a vacuum is constant.
Would that function if the observer were traveling more quickly than the speed of light? It turns out that is technically feasible, but there is a catch. The metric would have to have a single spatial dimension and three temporal dimensions. A normal particle travelling through our three-dimensional space will therefore appear to “age” in three separate directions of time from the perspective of such an observer.
Though the equations initially appear to be some sci-fi jargon, they end up repeating several essential aspects of quantum physics in addition to being consistent and without causing paradoxes. From their perspective, the particles simply behave in accordance with the superposition principle. The only need is that there be superluminal witnesses, not that the speed of light in a vacuum must differ (at least theoretically).
Professor Andrzej Dragan from the University of Warsaw and the National University of Singapore said in a statement that the field becomes the only quantity that can be used to describe the physical world for a superluminal observer and that the classical Newtonian point particle no longer makes sense.
“Prior to recently, it was widely accepted that the fundamental postulates underlying quantum theory could not be deduced from anything more fundamental. In this study, we demonstrated that the extended relativity justification of quantum theory may be naturally extended to 1 + 3 spacetime, which results in the field-theoretic formulation of quantum theory. This explains, or at least offers a plausible justification, why this extension is more than simply a bizarre thought experiment and instead reveals a basic truth about the symmetry of physical laws “In the paper, list the authors.
It would be wise to investigate this fascinating relationship between relativity and quantum mechanics further as it may offer fresh perspectives on both disciplines. Sadly, identifying particles that can travel faster than the speed of light is not the goal of the effort, which is purely theoretical.
“A huge research team with the newest experimental tools can accomplish the simply experimental discovery of a new fundamental particle, an achievement deserving of the Nobel Prize. To better understand the process of spontaneous symmetry breaking linked to the mass of the Higgs particle and other Standard Model components, particularly in the early cosmos, we want to use our findings, but “Professor Krzysztof Turzyski stated.
The work is published in the journal Classical and Quantum Gravity
Do not forget to share your opinion with us to provide you with the best posts !
0 Comments