Astronomers Conduct Extensive Examination of Hundreds of Stars for “Unusual Transits”

Telescopes have amassed extensive data on exoplanets in recent times. A prevalent dataset focuses on “transits,” where an exoplanet moves in front of its host star, causing a slight dimming of the star’s light. While this method has led to the discovery of most exoplanets, hidden intricacies within the data might exist. Consider, for instance, the implications if these transits defied conventional Newtonian physics. This discrepancy could suggest an intelligent force at play – a pursuit undertaken by researchers at Breakthrough Listen, detailed in a recent arXiv publication.

The researchers, technically, didn’t solely examine transits but a dataset known as a “lightcurve.” These graphs monitor an object’s brightness over time, with transits typically recognizable by a dip in a star’s lightcurve.

However, the impact of an exoplanet on a star’s lightcurve could vary in numerous ways. For instance, the transit’s path might differ across the star’s surface or occur at a slower pace during subsequent passes. Such anomalies keep astronomers vigilant, driving their continuous efforts, naturally!

During their leisure moments, their minds might wander to thoughts of extraterrestrial life. A civilization possessing advanced technology could potentially manipulate its planet’s lightcurve using massive thrusters or similar grand engineering endeavors. Speculatively, the planet itself might serve as such an engineering feat, resembling a Birch world or other colossal construct.

The means to investigate this hypothesis involves identifying any anomalous lightcurves beyond explanation by known physical phenomena. Regrettably, upon an initial examination of lightcurve data from Kepler, the conclusion appears to be negative.

This isn’t to dismiss the existence of anomalous signals entirely. Indeed, among the data, there were 228 exoplanetary systems exhibiting an “anomalous” signal. Yet, ten of these systems didn’t neatly align with the software model the researchers employed, known intriguingly as “Batman,” leaving them with 218 potential systems necessitating manual inspection.

To simplify this challenging task, the researchers categorized the anomalous signals into three distinct groups: missing transits, deeper-than-expected transits, and transits exhibiting significant “transit timing variations” (TTV), indicating either increased or decreased planetary speed compared to initial observations.

The comprehensive analysis of these 218 anomalous systems forms the core of the paper. However, despite this extensive research, there isn’t any evidence pointing to transits created by a potential technological source, commonly referred to as a “technosignature” by present-day astronomers.

Nevertheless, this remains an early phase. With over 5,000 discovered exoplanets amidst potentially billions in existence, statistical odds aren’t in our favor. Thus, more data becomes imperative. Sorting through this information, employing methodologies akin to those developed in this study, will remain a central focus for astrobiologists and SETI enthusiasts in the forthcoming decades. The influx of new planetary-hunting telescopes continually coming online ensures an abundant stream of data for exploration and analysis.

Do not forget to share your opinion with us to provide you with the best posts !