A Planet Moving in the Opposite Direction

Dr. Daniel Bayliss, an astronomer from the Australian National University, along with his colleagues, has made a groundbreaking discovery that challenges our previous understanding of planetary motion. Using a powerful telescope in Chile, they observed a distant planet called WASP-17b moving in the opposite direction to the spin of its host star. This finding contradicts the traditional theories of planet formation, which suggest that planets should orbit their stars in the same direction as the star’s spin.

The research conducted by Dr. Bayliss and his team has raised questions about the mechanisms involved in the formation of planets around stars. This significant breakthrough was presented by Dr. Bayliss at Fresh Science, a national program supported by the Australian Government, where early-career scientists showcase their research to the public.

Dr. Bayliss explains that WASP-17b is quite distinct, and its retrograde motion remains somewhat of an enigma to scientists.

He suggests that the planet may have experienced a close encounter with another massive planet billions of years ago, causing a significant disruption to its orbit and resulting in its backward orbit.

The prevalence of planets that orbit their stars in this retrograde manner is still unknown, but astronomers are actively observing distant planets to determine its frequency. If this phenomenon is widespread, it would not bode well for the possibility of life existing around other stars. Encounters between giant planets would likely obliterate any small Earth-like planets in the system, eliminating any chance of life emerging.

Currently, only a few distant planets have been identified. However, Dr. Bayliss is involved in the HAT-South project, which monitors millions of stars in the southern hemisphere for potential orbiting planets. As part of this initiative, he operates a network of telescopes in Australia, whose data is combined with that of identical telescope arrays in Chile and Namibia.

This article is republished from PhysORG under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.